1:7 – Constitutional Convention Or Convention Of States?
What is a constitutional convention?
Those who are pushing for an Article V convention, or a Convention of States, who refuse to call it a Constitutional Convention are either being intentionally deceptive, or are themselves deceived.
According to Black's Law Dictionary, a constitutional convention is:
“A duly constituted assembly of delegates or representatives of the people of a state or nation for the purpose of framing, revising, OR amending its constitution. Art. V of U.S. Const. provides that a Constitutional Convention may be called on the application of the Legislatures of two-thirds of the states.”
A convention for any of those purposes is defined as a constitutional convention. And of course, definitions are created by common usage.
For many years, those promoting a convention had no problem referring to it as a constitutional convention.
In 1983, during the last big push for a convention, we were two states away from the 34 state applications needed for a convention.
But as opposition grew, states began to rescind their applications. At the time it became commonly known that a “constitutional convention” was a dangerous idea.
In 2011, Robert Natelson, a prominent leader in the article v convention movement, announced, “I am going to put our concept on reset,” suggesting that they no longer use the term “constitutional convention” to sell their scheme to change the Constitution.
This, in reality, had nothing to do with the definition of the term. Rather, it was a re-branding effort to separate today's movement from the stigma of the thoroughly defeated and discredited constitutional convention movement of the ‘70s and ‘80s.
Be not deceived. What they were pushing for then under the name of a constitutional convention, and what they are pushing for now under any name but a constitutional convention, is really the same thing! A convention for "framing, revising, or amending its constitution."
Learn more about Article V and the amendment process by visiting JBS.org.
Recommended for you
View All3:5 – If An Article V Convention Is So Dangerous Why Did The Founders Include It In The Constitution?
An Article V convention is like a gun, it is neither good nor bad. It is just an extremely powerful tool. A gun in the right hands can be used for good. In the wrong hands, it can do terrible destruction. An Article V convention in the wrong hands can destroy what we have left ...
Watch Now3:4 – Proof That COS Project Utilized Fraud To Peddle Article V Convention
In recent years, state legislators have been receiving boxes of petitions allegedly from constituents demanding a “Convention of States.” These petitions are computer generated with names and addresses. But fail to include any signatures, phone numbers, or email addresses to verify. There are many legislators who have called some of these people and asked if ...
Watch Now3:3 – COS Project’s Response To JBS Claims That 1787 Convention Was A “Runaway
The debate between Convention of States Project leaders and The John Birch Society regarding the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and whether or not it was a “runaway convention” has been going on for years. In an interview with Bill Walton in October of 2022, Mark Meckler, president, and co-founder of COS said: “There’s never been ...
Watch Now3:2 – What Would A Constitutional Convention Look Like If It Were Held Today?
Have you ever considered, what would a convention look like today in today’s political environment? First, who would choose the delegates? If I’m the one handpicking the delegates to the convention, I think it would be a very different outcome than if Nancy Pelosi were doing so. He who chooses the delegates chooses the outcome. ...
Watch Now
