2:7 – False Solutions: Term Limits
Proposing a constitutional amendment for “Term Limits” is one of the most popular campaign messages out there. Many who believe term limits will fix the problems in Washington have no idea why our Founders didn’t add term limits to the Constitution.
Organization like COS (Convention of States) conveniently avoid discussing why they weren’t added either. Instead, they leverage all that “Term Limit” support when proposing to state legislators that they should apply to Congress to call an Article V Convention.
Convention of States Senior Advisor, Robert Natelson, has even been known to goad individuals by saying that an Article V convention hasn’t happened yet, “because Congress refuses to propose a term limits amendment, and we haven’t had the guts to call a (Article V) convention to propose one.”
What COS leaders fail to mention, is that our Founders completely rejected term limits. They had term limits in the Articles of Confederation and understood why such limits would be extremely harmful to a Republic.
Back then, term limits were called “ineligibility for re-appointment” and one of the most prominent Founders, Roger Sherman, emphasized the need for frequent elections instead of term limits. Sherman explained, “Frequent elections are necessary to preserve the good behavior of rulers. They also tend to give permanency to the Government, by preserving that good behavior, because it ensures their re-election.”
All in all, term limits lead to perpetual lame-duck Congresses.
A perfect illustration of this was caught on camera with an open mic at the 2012 Nuclear Security Summit where President Obama said to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev; “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”
So, what do you think will happen if the House of Representative and the Senate does not have to consider the impact of their actions for an upcoming election? Are you willing to take that risk?
Learn more about Article V and the amendment process by visiting JBS.org.
Recommended for you
View All
3:5 – If An Article V Convention Is So Dangerous Why Did The Founders Include It In The Constitution?
An Article V convention is like a gun, it is neither good nor bad. It is just an extremely powerful tool. A gun in the right hands can be used for good. In the wrong hands, it can do terrible destruction. An Article V convention in the wrong hands can destroy what we have left ...
Watch Now
3:4 – Proof That COS Project Utilized Fraud To Peddle Article V ConventionÂ
In recent years, state legislators have been receiving boxes of petitions allegedly from constituents demanding a “Convention of States.” These petitions are computer generated with names and addresses. But fail to include any signatures, phone numbers, or email addresses to verify. There are many legislators who have called some of these people and asked if ...
Watch Now
3:3 – COS Project’s Response To JBS Claims That 1787 Convention Was A “RunawayÂ
The debate between Convention of States Project leaders and The John Birch Society regarding the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and whether or not it was a “runaway convention” has been going on for years. In an interview with Bill Walton in October of 2022, Mark Meckler, president, and co-founder of COS said: “There’s never been ...
Watch Now
3:2 – What Would A Constitutional Convention Look Like If It Were Held Today? Â
Have you ever considered, what would a convention look like today in today’s political environment? First, who would choose the delegates? If I’m the one handpicking the delegates to the convention, I think it would be a very different outcome than if Nancy Pelosi were doing so. He who chooses the delegates chooses the outcome. ...
Watch Now